In a recent video by Copper Jacket TV, the host delved into the disturbing realities of New York’s gun confiscation process, revealing shocking details about the ease with which individuals can have their firearms seized. Describing it as “worse than you imagined,” the video sheds light on the unconstitutional nature of the state’s Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) system.
A Disturbing Revelation
The video begins with the host expressing his astonishment at the extent of government-sanctioned confiscation in New York. Despite previous discussions on the topic, the host admits to being taken aback by the details uncovered during his research. He emphasizes the urgency of the issue and urges viewers to pay attention to the concerning developments unfolding in their state.
Unpacking the Affidavit
The host proceeds to dissect the affidavit required for obtaining an ERPO in New York. Drawing attention to specific sections of the document, he highlights the alarming simplicity of the process. Notably, individuals can file for an ERPO based solely on the recent acquisition of a firearm, without any substantial evidence of potential harm.
Completely Unconstitutional
This minimalist approach to justifying confiscation raises serious questions about due process and constitutional rights.
Unchecked Authority and Intrusive Measures
Further scrutiny reveals additional troubling aspects of the ERPO process. The host exposes provisions that grant petitioners unchecked authority over search permissions, allowing them to dictate when and where law enforcement conducts searches of the respondent’s property. This unchecked power raises concerns about privacy violations and the erosion of Fourth Amendment protections.
Consequences of Confiscation
The video underscores the severe consequences faced by individuals subjected to ERPOs. Once a confiscation order is issued, individuals may find themselves stripped of their firearms and subjected to prolonged legal battles to reclaim their property and restore their rights. The host shares anecdotal accounts of individuals who have endured such ordeals, highlighting the devastating impact of arbitrary confiscation measures.
Outside Perspective
People in the comments shared their thoughts: “I don’t know how anyone can support denying the rights of another American, and still have the audacity to consider themselves an American.”
Others chimed in with an outside perspective: “As a Aussie to watch illegal migrants get guns but citizens can’t wtf… that’s insane.”
Focus On Illegal Weapons
Another commenter added: “It would be nice if they spent as much time and resources to remove illegal weapons as they do on removing legally owned firearms.”
Finally, one person concluded: “Any law enforcement officer that enforces this should be ashamed of themselves. I have 46 years in LE and I would not enforce this!”
A Call to Action
In concluding the video, the host urges viewers to remain vigilant and informed about their rights. He emphasizes the importance of education and awareness in combating unjust policies and protecting individual liberties. By spreading awareness and advocating for change, citizens can work towards safeguarding their constitutional rights and holding elected officials accountable.
Legislative Reforms
What do you think? How can citizens ensure greater accountability and oversight regarding ERPOs and similar confiscation measures? What legislative reforms are needed to address the constitutional concerns raised by New York’s confiscation process?
The Influence Of Activism
In what ways do the revelations in the video underscore broader issues related to due process and individual rights? How can public awareness and activism influence policy decisions and promote respect for constitutional principles?
