Chicago, known for its persistent struggle with gun violence, has taken a bold step in its fight against illegal firearms. On Wednesday, the city filed a lawsuit against Glock, a prominent firearm manufacturer, alleging that the company’s pistols can be readily modified into fully automatic weapons, posing a significant threat to public safety.
The Allegations Against Glock
According to the lawsuit, Glock’s pistols are susceptible to modifications using “Glock switches,” which effectively transform them into illegal machine guns. Chicago authorities have reported over 1,100 instances of modified Glocks recovered at crime scenes since 2021, underscoring the severity of the issue.
Prioritizing Profits Over Safety?
Mayor Brandon Johnson expressed grave concern over the proliferation of fully automatic Glocks on the city’s streets, emphasizing the need for accountability. He accused Glock of prioritizing profits over public safety and vowed to collaborate with stakeholders to address the crisis of gun violence gripping Chicago.
The Accessibility of Illegal Modifications
One of the key grievances highlighted in the lawsuit is the ease with which Glock pistols can be modified using inexpensive auto sears, costing as little as $20. These devices, no larger than a quarter, can be installed with minimal effort, significantly enhancing the weapon’s rate of fire to levels comparable to illegal automatic firearms.
Rising Concerns and Federal Data
The lawsuit draws attention to alarming trends in firearm recoveries, as reported by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). The agency documented a staggering increase in the confiscation of illegally modified machine guns and auto sears, indicating a growing threat posed by modified firearms.
Glock’s Alleged Negligence
Chicago accuses Glock of turning a blind eye to the illegal exploitation of its firearm design, despite being aware of the issue. The lawsuit denounces Glock’s inaction as morally reprehensible and accuses the company of endangering the lives of Chicago residents by perpetuating the cycle of gun violence.
The Demands and Ramifications
The lawsuit demands that Glock cease sales of its pistols in Chicago or implement design changes to prevent easy modification. Additionally, it seeks monetary damages for the harm caused by the proliferation of illegal firearms in the city.
Who Is Really To Blame?
Over on Reddit, people are sharing their thoughts: “Why not sue all the Chinese websites and companies creating and distributing them?”
Another person said: “Because the Chinese companies aren’t a gun manufacturer and both Chicago and Everytown have been picking at the edges of the PLCAA to try to find a way to return to their goal of litigating gun manufacturers out of existence.”
You Could Sue Every Company
Some added humor to the discussion with sarcastic remarks: “My car goes faster than the speed limit. Clearly the manufacturer needs to be sued.”
One commenter concluded: “So they’re suing companies that make things that could be illegally modified and used for crime? So… every company that makes things then? I mean, I could duct tape a hand grenade to a plunger and use it for evil… so let’s sue plunger companies!”
A Call for Accountability and Action
Chicago’s lawsuit against Glock marks an interesting development in the ongoing battle against gun violence. By holding firearm manufacturers accountable for the illegal modification of their products, the city aims to stem the tide of illegal firearms and safeguard the well-being of its residents. Whether that is the correct course of action is something that should be discussed.
Are Manufacturers Responsible?
What are your thoughts? Should firearm manufacturers bear responsibility for the illegal modification of their products? What measures can be implemented to prevent the unauthorized modification of firearms?
The Impact On Gun Control
How might this lawsuit impact future gun control legislation and industry practices? What role do cities and municipalities play in addressing the issue of gun violence? How can stakeholders collaborate to promote firearm safety and mitigate the risk of illegal firearms proliferation?
