In a recent video, Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes highlight a new wave of censorship targeting Second Amendment supporters. This article delves into their insights on how big tech companies, particularly YouTube, are implementing policies that restrict firearm-related content. The duo warns of the broader implications for gun enthusiasts and offers advice on how to counter these challenges.
YouTube’s New Censorship Rule
YouTube is set to implement a new rule on June 18, 2024, which targets content related to firearms. This rule, according to the Armed Attorneys, is a significant escalation in the platform’s efforts to censor gun-related videos. The rule not only affects content creators but also has broader implications for viewers who rely on these channels for information and entertainment.
Impact on Content Creators
Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes explain that the new rule will severely limit the types of firearm-related content that can be posted on YouTube. Activities such as showing how to 3D print firearms, milling out 80% lowers, and attaching bump stocks will be prohibited. Even demonstrating the use of high-capacity magazines or firing automatic firearms will be restricted. These changes will force many content creators to either alter their content drastically or risk being deplatformed.
Broader Trends in Censorship
The attorneys highlight that this censorship trend is not limited to YouTube. Other social media platforms like Facebook and TikTok have also been implementing stringent rules against gun-related content. This coordinated effort by big tech companies is seen as a way to suppress speech that is not aligned with certain political views, particularly those supporting the Second Amendment.
Government and Corporate Collusion
Taylor and Hayes argue that there is a growing trend of governments using private corporations to enforce policies they cannot directly impose. This strategy allows for the suppression of Second Amendment rights through indirect means. They cite examples of financial institutions refusing services to gun-related businesses and credit card companies tracking firearm purchases.
Fighting Back
Despite the grim outlook, the Armed Attorneys emphasize that all hope is not lost. They discuss legislative successes at the state level, such as laws in Texas that prevent discrimination against firearms businesses. These victories show that concerted efforts can push back against the encroachments on Second Amendment rights.
The Role of the Community
The attorneys call on the community to stay vigilant and proactive. They encourage viewers to support Second Amendment advocacy groups, contact their legislators, and remain informed about ongoing legal battles. They also stress the importance of using alternative platforms to share content and stay connected.
Setting Up for the Future
In anticipation of further restrictions, Emily and Richard are preparing a new website and newsletter. This platform will serve as a hub for their content, ensuring that their audience can continue to access valuable legal information and updates on Second Amendment issues, even if their YouTube channel is compromised.
The Size of the Channels
People in the comments shared their opinions: “They freaked out once they figured out how big and how fast gun channels are getting.”
Another commenter said: “The first thing President Trump should do is to repeal or change Section 230. I’m tired of being harassed by these platforms.”
Another commenter concluded: “It amazes me that gen x fought against censorship of 2Live Crew, musicians as a whole, video games, etc. then we raised these anti 1A idiots.”
Unprecedented Challenges
The Armed Attorneys’ warning is clear: Second Amendment supporters are facing unprecedented challenges from big tech censorship. However, through community support, legislative action, and strategic planning, there are ways to fight back. Staying informed and proactive is crucial in defending the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment.
Counteracting Big Tech Censorship
What are your thoughts? How can Second Amendment supporters effectively counteract big tech censorship while staying within the bounds of the law? What are the potential long-term consequences of social media platforms continuing to restrict firearm-related content? How can legislators at the state and federal levels work together to protect the rights of gun owners in the face of corporate censorship?
Explore the full insights by viewing the video on Armed Attorneys’ YouTube channel here.
